[rollei_list] Re: Digital Advice
- From: "Peter K." <peterk727@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 12:29:28 -0700
You can believe what you want. Everyone justifies what they own especially
those who cling to their film cameras.
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Austin Franklin <
austin.franklin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> > Now that the output from these cameras far exceed the quality that
> > I could produce (for my normal wedding/photojournalism work) with 35mm
> > film...
>
> Shooting both film and digital, for quite a few years, I still don't see
> higher digital quality from any sub $2k digital camera than 35mm film.
> But,
> that's using my criteria...some people think that sharpness somehow is
> higher image quality...but in reality, it is typically not. I think a lot
> of the digital "quality" people like, like sharpness, are a false metric
> with respect to actual image fidelity. Comics are very sharp, but have
> little detail.
>
> So, anyway, though I fully appreciate and agree that *some* people believe
> their digital output has higher "quality" than they got with film, I
> believe
> a lot of it is misperception of actual image fidelity. But, hey, since in
> today's society perception is everything (reality takes a back seat), then
> if they think an image with lower image fidelity is higher "quality", who
> am
> I to argue.
>
> The bottom line is, it really depends on what the criteria for "quality"
> is.
> That, for some reason, seems to almost never be stated.
>
> Regards,
>
> Austin
>
> ---
> Rollei List
>
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
>
>
--
Peter K
Ó¿Õ¬
Other related posts:
