[rollei_list] Re: Digital Advice
- From: Michael Eric Berube <pj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 11:37:31 -0400
Marc James Small wrote:
Even without Photoshop or like software, the cost is still prohibitive
for high-end work:
camera at least $800
lenses take your pick, but at least $250 or more for
a single one
printer a high-end printer is going to run several
thousand dollars
dedicated computer $1200 or more (I am running on a 2002 Pentium
Four, by the way)
specialty inks several hundred dollars, with the need to
restock frequrently
specialty papers about the same, with usage controlling total
price, of course
I'm going to take the rare opportunity and disagree with you here Marc.
I feed my family with photography (OH! Rodinal for supper
again!...sorry.) :)
From your list above, I have cameras, lenses and a dedicated computer.
Keeping up with the burgeoning DSLR tech is the only exorbitant cost
involved so far and even there the prices keep dropping for much better
tech. Now that the output from these cameras far exceed the quality that
I could produce (for my normal wedding/photojournalism work) with 35mm
film, even this constant turn over will now slow down a bit.
I needed similar lenses even with a film camera and have no more need to
constantly update them than I did then, so that is a wash.
While my PCs used to be custom built and pretty costly, for the past
year and a half, I'm working on a basic $500 old Dell Dimension 1100 at
the moment (XPHome) with 2GB RAM ($100) and it is working fine for my
usual workflow of ~700 10-12MP NEFs per job. My next 'upgrade' will be
a mid priced Mac (with Parallels and XPHome too), but currently I don't
foresee needing to do this any time soon. For archival storage I use
fairly affordable external HDs (one or two per year, at the moment,
320GB ea. These cost about $150 and like the cameras, the price will
only keep going down.) I also use MAM-A Gold DVDs. A year's supply of
which costs less than the film used to from one wedding.
It is MUCH more affordable and less hassle in the long run for me to use
a commercial printer that someone else gets to pay for monthly, than to
print my own at home. With proper profiling, any good lab today (like
WHCC.com) will be able to far more affordably print to my specs than
buying a high end home printer and keeping it fed with quality ink and
paper.
My TIME commitment has gone up considerably since 'going digital' in
2002, but the actual outlay of cash invested in assets and materials has
diminished and this time commitment has greatly increased the quality of
my final product.
Carpe lumen,
Michael
-There has not been the death of a man that has not brought joy to
another man?
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
