The RSO and PM should be faced toward the range just like the LCO. The flight card board needs to be redone. There should always be a Spotter to assist the LCO. Richard Sent from my iPhone On Jun 26, 2012, at 4:31 PM, David Erbas-White <derbas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 6/26/2012 2:58 PM, Mike Riss wrote: >> I'm not sure that waiting for 30 minutes is necessarily bad. It's surely >> not optimum, but if >> there are 45+ pads, and if almost every pad is occupied, that's something >> less than 1 minute >> processing time per pad. >> > > Please note that I never said that every pad was occupied, simply that it is > very common to wait 30 minutes (or more!) for a launch. At ROCStock last > November, I had one rocket sitting on the pad for an hour and fifteen minutes > -- so I was being 'conservative' with the 30 minute comment. I also tried to > point out that if the banks of pads were actually CYCLED in order, that much > (if not all) of the problem would be alleviated - the point being that a bank > of pads is often overlooked for extended periods of time. It's along the > lines of (for example) all banks being launched multiple times EXCEPT the > rack that I'm on. > > I do my best to NOT comment to the LCO or PM about overlooking banks of pads, > because I don't want to discourage folks from doing those jobs, and those few > times I have made comments it's generally not even been my rocket on the pad > (something along the lines of, "Hey, that purple rocket on pad 24 has been > sitting there for a while, hasn't it?"). > > I'll point out that sometimes a rocket is ignored when you have one or two > small, unpainted, almost invisible rockets on the middle pads -- and the LCO > isn't even aware that there are rockets sitting there waiting for launch. In > this situation, it's extremely important for the PM to ensure that those > cards are given to the LCO so they don't sit there forever. > > I'm personally convinced that whatever system is implemented simply needs to > be one that 'reminds' the LCO/PM about cycling the pads in order -- that's > what Rick's comment was about, what the 'Starbucks timer' method was about, > and my suggestion of a 'gizmo' that gets reset by the arming signal. Bottom > line is that (and I KNOW I'm guilty of this myself) the LCO will tend to > launch the rack that looks to be the fullest -- even if another rack with > fewer rockets has been waiting longer. > > Just sitting here writing this I thought of another Rube Goldberg method -- a > flashing light at each bank. This light will be initiated by a timer that is > triggered by the first press of a continuity button on the given bank, and > will be reset by arming a row. Here's how it works -- assume an empty bank, > no rockets. So, no flashing (ever). Someone comes out, puts a rocket on a > pad. They check continuity by pushing the button. This starts a (for > example) 10-minute timer. Second guy comes up five minutes later, puts a > rocket, presses the continuity button. This DOES NOT reset the timer. Ten > minutes after the first guy has put his rocket on the pad, the flashing light > out at the pads starts blinking (could be duplicated at the control panel, as > well). This tells one and all (LCO/PM and rocketeers) that this bank is 'due > for launch', and no more rockets should be placed. The LCO arms the pad, > which shuts off/resets the light, he launches the bank, and the light remains > off until the next rocket is placed on the bank. If there are five banks > with flashing lights, well, then there are at least five banks that have had > a rocket sitting for at least ten minutes -- and the LCO should be launching > those banks and ignoring any non-flashing banks. > > Over to you... <G> > > David Erbas-White > > > > -- > ROC-Chat mailing list > roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > //www.freelists.org/list/roc-chat > -- ROC-Chat mailing list roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx //www.freelists.org/list/roc-chat