How did the RSO become the rocket inspector and most of the time they have their back to the range? Richard Sent from my iPhone On Jun 26, 2012, at 3:56 PM, "Ken Curran" <rocket1dog@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Not much said about the RSO duties... > > > > > -------Original Message------- > > From: Michael Klett > Date: 6/26/2012 3:14:37 PM > To: roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [roc-chat] Re: Separate LPR area at ROCtober > > Mike, > > I always try to take at least one shift during the big launch weekends > and I'm willing to take more if I'm going to be there long enough. > I'm willing to cover a shift on a regular launch weekend as well but > often my son takes that for the family - he really likes doing it. > > You had said, "For instance, if someone feels that lack of > information/training is an issue, why not approach the board, request > the info, and produce materials to rectify the situation? Or, if the > info doesn't exist, offer to develop it? Would it really take that > much more time and effort to do that than was spent commenting on the > lack of it?" Umm, actually, I had never thought of it until Rick > mentioned it and my first thought was, "Hey, that's really cool! I > wish I would've known that before." I did what I thought was my best > impersonation of what I had seen other people do before me, basically > OJT. I had taken the slow times so it wasn't too bad. So basically, > I would've happily help develop it if I had realized that I had needed > it. I do need to spend more time on the lake bed learning. And I > discuss it here because it is one thing that I can do now between > launches. I'm happy for all of this discussion as I am learning so > much. > > And since e-mail can be such a terrible way of communicating I do want > to assure you that this post isn't intended to be a flame, purely > informational. If it came across as a flame I apologize. My feathers > are NOT ruffled, my spirits are bright, I'm having a really good day > today, and I'm looking forward to flying in just two and a half weeks. > I wish the same for you. > > Thanks, > Mike > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Mike Riss <rockt_dude@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'm not sure that waiting for 30 minutes is necessarily bad. It's surely > > not optimum, but if > > there are 45+ pads, and if almost every pad is occupied, that's something > > less than 1 minute > > processing time per pad. > > > > And, is it really an issue, or just unrealistic expectations? Given that > > we have difficulty > > filling range duty slots, is it realistic to expect volunteers to meet the > > *ideal* performance level? > > > > And, do these discussions create a self-fulfilling prophecy by discouraging > > people from not > > volunteering because they don't want to be lambasted for less than ideal > > performance either on > > the 'Chat, or as sometimes happens in person? > > > > Not looking to discourage discussion, but I wonder: if the same (as in "in > > addition to", not > > "instead of") amount of time and effort was spent *doing* something as is > > spent discussing it, > > would there still be an issue? > > > > For instance, if someone feels that lack of information/training is an > > issue, why not approach > > the board, request the info, and produce materials to rectify the > > situation? Or, if the info doesn't exist, offer to develop it? Would it > > really > > take that much more time and effort to do that than was spent commenting on > > the lack of it? > > > > Looks like some info previously existed, but didn't get ported to the > > current website: > > > > http://web.archive.bibalex.org/web/20060222064909/www.rocstock.org/rules.lcos.html > > > > Looks like there was also info for RSO and PM. Between this and Rick D's > > post, shouldn't take > > much time or effort to resolve this particular issue. > > > > But I guess, just like filling range duty slots, people will wait until > > someone -- as in, > > someone *else* -- does something about it :-( > > > > Mike > > > > -- > > ROC-Chat mailing list > > roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > //www.freelists.org/list/roc-chat > > > > -- > ROC-Chat mailing list > roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > //www.freelists.org/list/roc-chat >