<quote who=Gianni Rondinini] date=[20/04/2006 09:06/> > uhm, i realize my mail sounds a bit rude. disregard it. > > read that this way: 200usd/hour is a big lot of money, anything you > may be talking about [1], and expecially if you go on charging for > prints and films, too. i don't know of any "common" photographer > taking that money. i think that making your customers pay for film and > prints *and* some extra for your time is ok, but 150/200usd seems me > really too much. The rate includes film and development. I recently did a studio shoot. I only charged for materials. My time was free. It cost the client $220 just in film, studio and development. No prints. Add in 3hrs of my time in the studio, plus say 2hrs for development time plus the time it took to rent the studio, go to the colour lab twice.. Figure another hour of my time. That's six hours total. At $150 an hour x 3 hrs = $450 charged to the client. $450 - $220 (film and dev) = $230 $230 / 6hrs = $40/h I'd say I'm pretty cheap. That doesn't include the cost of my equipment and the usual hassles of dealing with 6 primadonnas. J -- Justin F. Knotzke jknotzke@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.shampoo.ca ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.