[pure-silver] Re: D-76 and variations

  • From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 15:25:23 -0800


----- Original Message ----- From: "Koch, Gerald" <gkoch02@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 1:12 PM
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: D-76 and variations



I was of the understanding that the packaged version was similar to
D-76d but contained half the amounts of borax and boric acid. There are
many ways to create the necessary buffer, the use of Kodalk would just
require more boric acid.


That is possible. Its pretty hard to determine the actual amounts of anything from the MSDS, only approximate ratios. In the Carlton and Crabtree paper a lot is made of the ability to adjust the activity of the developer by varying the ratio of the buffer components. I think this was aimed at those developing motion picture film on machines where the _time_ of development was hard to adjust independantly of other factors, its hard to know for certain. At the time the industry was just beginning to use automatic continuous processing machines and a lot of negative work was still done on rack-and-tank machines. The increased use of photographic sound tracks forced the use of machine processing and very much closer sensitometric control than had been the practice previously.

---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your 
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) 
and unsubscribe from there.

Other related posts: