[projectaon] Re: 27v Errata
- From: John TFS <johntfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 23:31:08 +0000
Well, we've had a little discussion over this issue, so, for at least some
people, it doesn't go without saying. I suppose my argument for putting a
footnote in there is "why not?" As you said, most of time people can choose
which item they want to do something with and they might assume that this is
the case here, despite what the text indicates. Putting a footnote in fully
clarifies the situation. So, unless it's just a pain in the ass to do or
otherwise a lot of work, I'd say to do it.
> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 08:21:55 -0700
> Subject: [projectaon] Re: 27v Errata
> From: jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 7:00 AM, John TFS <johntfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I think so. Something like "Even if you have access to another Weapon or
> > Weapon-like Special Item such as Sunderer or the Andarin Warhammer, you
> > must use your Kai
> > Weapon in this instance and accept whatever damage it receives. You may, of
> > course, choose to use other Weapons or Special Items like the above in
> > future combats."
>
>
> Doesn't this footnote go without saying? For the first part, Joe makes
> it clear that this damage is to your Kai Weapon. For the second part,
> don't the rules assume that the reader generally gets to choose which
> items to use? If the footnote boils down to "follow the rules" ... :)
>
> --
> Jon
>
> ~~~~~~
> Manage your subscription at //www.freelists.org/list/projectaon
>
>
Other related posts:
