-=PCTechTalk=- Re: Monitor size, resolution and visibilty

  • From: GuitarMan <gman.pctt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 05:32:39 -0400

Don,
    The difference would be very similar to upgrading her to a 
non-widescreen 19 inch monitor as far as icon and text sizes go.  In other 
words, the same resolutions would cause those items to actually appear 
larger, so you would need to step up to the next set of resolutions (the 
ones designed for the aspect ratio of the widescreen) to make a more fair 
comparison.  On the other hand, she'll have a lot less side scrolling to do 
given the extra few horizontal inches.

    Your best bet would be to talk with one of the folks who work in the 
electronics dept at your Walmart and ask if they could give you a quick side 
by side comparison diruing your lunchbreak.  It should only take a minute or 
so to adjust the resolutions on a couple of display systems.

Peace,
Gman

"The only dumb questions are the ones we fail to ask."

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <dsw32952@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 11:38 AM
Subject: -=PCTechTalk=- Monitor size, resolution and visibilty


>
> My Mom needs a very low resolution on her display to make the items on the 
> screen large enough for her to see clearly.  That makes it difficult to 
> work on her computer and you must constantly scroll left and right to see 
> everything.  That is a real pain when reading text.  (thats the setup for 
> what comes next)
>
> If I have a 17" CRT monitor (4:3 aspect ratio) with the resolution set to 
> 600x480 the icons on the desktop are large.  If I increase the resolution 
> to 800x600 or 1024x768 the icons become medium and small.
>
> If I switch to a 22" widescreen LCD monitor, using the same resolutions 
> will the physical size of the icons be the same as they were on the CRT? 
> Think visibilty here.
>
> In other words:
>
> "The quick brown fox"  is visible without scrolling on the old monitor at 
> 640x480.  Will "The quick brown fox jumped over" be visible on the 
> widescreen without sacrificing visibilty?
>
> "The quick brown fox jumped"  vs "The quick brown fox jumped over the" at 
> 800x600?
>
> "The quick brown fox jumped over the" vs "The quick brown fox jumped over 
> the lazy dog" at 1024x768?
>
> I want to keep the larger physical size of the items on the display to 
> maintain visibilty and at the same time reduce or eliminate the need for 
> scrolling left and right.  Can that be done?
>
> Don 


---------------------------------------------------------------
Please remember to trim your replies (including this sentence and everything 
below it) and adjust the subject line as necessary.

To unsubscribe or change your email settings:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk

To access our Archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/
//www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/

To contact only the PCTT Mod Squad, write to:
pctechtalk-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
---------------------------------------------------------------

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. pctechtalk
  3. Archive
  4. 07-2008