John Shutt wrote: inline ... > Tom, > > The idea of the simulcast rule was to ensure that people could comfortably > switch to digital television without losing their current programming. > That makes some sense but I still really don't think it is a large factor. The content will go where it sells except for some political manipulations, mostly threats. > Without a simulcast rule, the DTV channel can be treated as a second channel > with separate unique programming from the NTSC, and will make it harder > politically to ever turn of NTSC. > Yes it can, but I don't buy the implication. > DTV can hardly be called a replacement for NTSC if it is not required to > duplicate what is on NTSC. That does not logically follow, and need no refutation. The period we are in can hardly be called a > transition if you can't get the same thing in both places (analog and > digital.) ditto If the content is not identical, it is dual broadcasting, not a > transition. ditto, I think that is just semantics. DTV has now become a premium service, not a replacement > service. DTV will probably be a mix of both, and rightly so. I'd let it happen. - Tom (but still a proud member of the AVS Forum crowd) > > John Shutt > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tom Barry" <trbarry@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >>What possible use was the simulcast rule? >> >>- Tom > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: > > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at > FreeLists.org > > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word > unsubscribe in the subject line. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.