[ncolug] Re: Wireless router - your suggestion

  • From: Kory Pounds <kory.pounds@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: NCOLUG <ncolug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 18:40:17 -0400

I am not familiar with a powered patch panel, although maybe it would come
back to mind if it was explained to me?


On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 6:20 PM, tech4u <techconsultant4u@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  Why not try a powered patch panel.
>
> Cory
>
> On 5/28/13 5:15 PM, Chuck wrote:
>
> It's an Enterasys <http://www.enterasys.com/> model 
> BL-69524ENT<https://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.enterasys.com/company/literature/poe-69000-ds.pdf&sa=U&ei=ch2lUdGbOoHJygHqooC4BQ&ved=0CAcQFjAA&client=internal-uds-cse&usg=AFQjCNFLrGO6H0F4WiEw2Ykak3YN3eCbrQ>.
> I knew next-to nothing about it when I bought it; I did know that it was
> going to cost me $60.  Now all I need is a nice 242-port switch to hang
> behind it.  (As it stands, I have a mix of small un-managed throw away
> switches just waiting for a lightning strike to give me an excuse for
> upgrade... But they will meet my needs for now.)
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 16:33 -0400, M. Knisely wrote:
>
> That's the route I was looking at going.  I've got several good 24 or 48
> port switches.  I really don't need a new switch.  What is the injector you
> got?
>
>
>
>  Mike K.
>
>
>
>  On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Chuck <cstickelman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Give up on looking for a switch, and instead try to find a multi-port
> mid-span injector.  I bought one on e-bay for $60 earlier this year.  My
> tests show that 23/24 ports are providing poser, and that the unit is
> manageable, so it seems like a good deal.  The only bummer is that I
> will need to get a bunch of 2-inch long patch cables to go from my
> switch to the injector! :) (Not really.  I am joking.  Poking fun at a
> change-resistant IT company that had dozens of such patch cables...)
>
>
>
> On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 16:19 -0400, M. Knisely wrote:
> > In my office I have about 160 ports available... 0 are powered.  I
> > still haven't found a value positioned powered switch that I'm willing
> > to run in my home network.  Anyone have a suggestion?
> >
> >
> > Mike K.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Chuck <cstickelman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >         I agree with the "When possible, hard wire" mentality.  I was
> >         just
> >         thinking about how many things would benefits from networking
> >         and
> >         POE/POE+, and I believe that there are only a few devices in
> >         the average
> >         household that absolutely need 110V AC power.
> >
> >
> >         On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 16:00 -0400, M. Knisely wrote:
> >         > I've got the 2.4Ghz only version of this:
> >         > http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0028ACYEK
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         > I love it.  It runs DD-WRT from the factory so it's got
> >         every bell and
> >         > whistle you could want.... oh, and it's gigabit on the wired
> >         side.
> >         >
> >         >
> >         > The big thing to remember when you're putting in wireless is
> >         to look
> >         > at the channels that the other APs in your area are set to.
> >          Also
> >         > recall that when your wireless, in the 2.4Ghz range, is set
> >         to a
> >         > particular channel, it will bleed over 1.5 channels in
> >         either
> >         > direction.  For example, an AP on channel 6 will overlap
> >         half the
> >         > channel range of 4, all of 5, all of 6, all of 7 and half of
> >         8.  This
> >         > is why we say that the "useable" channels in the US are 1,
> >         6, and 11.
> >         >
> >         >
> >         > So, do your homework and assign your channels
> >         appropriately.  That
> >         > will significantly increase your overall throughput on the
> >         wireless.
> >         >  When possible, hard wire.
> >         >
> >         >
> >         > Mike K.
> >         >
> >         >
> >         > Mike K.
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Kory Pounds
> >         <kory.pounds@xxxxxxxxx>
> >         > wrote:
> >         >         Everyone,
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >         In a couple months I may be moving into a place
> >         in-town. I
> >         >         will need a new Wireless Router and I need your
> >         suggestions.
> >         >         There will be residences around me in this area with
> >         many
> >         >         wireless devices of different types. What do you
> >         suggest for a
> >         >         dependable wireless router with:
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >         1. Dual band, 2.4 and 5.0. My laptop is dual-band
> >         for one
> >         >         thing.
> >         >
> >         >         2. typical 4 ethernet ports
> >         >
> >         >         3. USB port for universal access to common files
> >         >
> >         >         4. simple network capabilities
> >         >
> >         >         5. Encryption is mandatory. packets will be easy to
> >         sniff but
> >         >         with data streams encrypted, the neighbors will not
> >         be able to
> >         >         do anything with it. Minimum WPA2, etc. Don't let it
> >         slow
> >         >         wireless connection down too much with this.
> >         >
> >         >         6. ability to not interfere/hiccup with other
> >         wireless
> >         >         activity nearby
> >         >
> >         >         7. signal strength/range in house
> >         >
> >         >         8. dependability - not fail after a few months and
> >         stuff
> >         >
> >         >         9. support/help from manufacturer
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >         What other features are critical to you?
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >         So what do you suggest?
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >         Kory
> >         >
> >         >         --
> >         >         www.oncedead.com
> >         >
> >         >         It is not what you do that determines who you are,
> >         it is who
> >         >         you are that determines what you do.
> >         >
> >         >
> >
> >
> >
> >         To unsubscribe send to ncolug-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> >         'unsubscribe' in the Subject field.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> To unsubscribe send to ncolug-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in
> the Subject field.
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
www.oncedead.com

It is not what you do that determines who you are, it is who you are that
determines what you do.

Other related posts: