Not so sure I agree with you there. On one of my engines I could not get the injector to work reliably. It wasn't until I modified the clack valve, at someone else's suggestion, to increase the ball lift that it worked correctly, regardless of what make injector I fitted. Until then I was sceptical of the idea as well. Andy ----- Original Message ----- From: "Terry Lane" <tel@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: <modeleng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 7:31 PM Subject: [modeleng] Re: Injectors Yeah, that theory derived from an LBSCism. Old Curly said that a clack valve for an injector COULD have a long lift to the delivery ball, as it ain't floggin' up & down all the time like one fed by an axle pump does. > I would not believe that one too much. > > All correctly designed and made check valves will operate perfectly on > either. > > Next fallacy? <GRIN> > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Harry Wade" <hww@xxxxxxxx> > To: <modeleng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 7:56 AM > Subject: [modeleng] Re: Injectors > > > > At 11:34 PM 3/18/05 -0000, you wrote: > > >I think the item that causes the biggest problem for injectors are the > clack > > >valves. The balls should have a diffrent lift for either pump or injector > > - Andy > > > > Which one to which? > > > > Regards, > > Harry > > > > MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST. > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to, > > modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject > line. > > > > > > > > MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST. > > To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to, > modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject line. > MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST. To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to, modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject line. MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST. To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to, modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject line.