Quoting John McCreery <john.mccreery@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 12:48 AM, <wokshevs@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > I respectfully submit that first, it is not possible to "waft" between two > > notions, statements, women, religions, traffic lanes, etc.. To waft is not > > to > > waver. > > > To waft is not to waver, but that does not rule out wafting between two > propositions in any but a thoroughly regimented world locked in Weber's iron > cage of rationality. > > Wafting, floating, drifting, slithering from one proposition to another: > the usual term is "brainstorming", suspending critical censorship and > releasing the mind to follow associations where it will. Often to > foolishness but sometimes to genuine insight. > > John I rest my case, your honour. Walter O. Wafting District Attorney Supremist Court St. John's, NL > > -- > John McCreery > The Word Works, Ltd., Yokohama, JAPAN > Tel. +81-45-314-9324 > http://www.wordworks.jp/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html