[lit-ideas] Re: New Program in Psychoanalysis and Culture
- From: Donal McEvoy <donalmcevoyuk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:08:42 +0000 (GMT)
--- On Wed, 23/7/08, Robert Paul <rpaul@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Yet is there such a thing as "belief"
> without the content of the belief?
>
> For example?
My previous post dealt with how this question is potentially misleading (viz.
that we cannot exemplify or _specify_ such a belief without mentioning its
(propositional?) _content_, would not show that our attitides to such
(propositional?) content (which attitudes are necessasy to the state of belief)
cannot subsist or exist without such specificable content.
Of course, anyone who know the answer here will also know how to reply to
Popper's brilliant attack on 'Turing-Machines' as showing how human thought and
language must be computers of sorts because _if we can suitably specify them in
their contents_ we can get computers to ape our use of these contents to _any
degree of specification we might demand_. This demand contains a trap.
So does RP's for "an example".
D
__________________________________________________________
Not happy with your email address?.
Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at
Yahoo! http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/ymail/new.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
