Language is surely such that if there is as yet no word for P, but there should be a word for P, then there eventually will be a word for P. I guess it follows that any "ideal" natural language would bear all the words we are fated to come to have as a species. (Excluding certain words uttered by Mike G, of course.) I think Charles Saunders Pierce may have said something like that.... even though, to the best of my knowledge, Chuck never met Mike G. Walter O. Quoting Mike Geary <atlas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > WO: > > P.S. Is "wafting" a word? > > See there how the withies of the willow trees waft so gently in the > whispering breeze. > > Who cares if there's such a word -- there SHOULD BE! > That's the difference between you and me. : ) > > Mike Geary > whiffling my life away in Memphis > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html