[lit-ideas] Re: Link to "Mohammed" cartoons
- From: "Lawrence Helm" <lawrencehelm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 10:20:20 -0800
Yes, the Associated Press article says that Bush spoke on Wednesday and that
this was the first time he had spoken on this matter.
Lawrence
-----Original Message-----
From: lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of P.H.Lundbech
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 9:37 AM
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Link to "Mohammed" cartoons
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 08:22:35 -0800, "Lawrence Helm"
<lawrencehelm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>According to my morning paper (the Riverside Press Enterprise), Bush was
>more nuanced that the headlines and references had us believe.
Exactly when was this? The US 'condemnation' of the cartoons came
several days before the support to Denmark and only AFTER our
embassy in Syria was burnt down.
>His
>condemnation of the cartoons wasn't quite a condemnation as I see it.
They were you're words, nor mine!
>Terrence Hunt of the Associated Press writes, "he defended the rights of
>newspapers to print what they see fit. But he felt obliged to tell the
news
>media they must be sensitive about their power to offend."
When did he defend those rights? Do you have a date?
P. H. Lundbech
Odense, DK
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
