What I had in mind and sorry for the confusion was that being certain that Ursula lives in Canada e.g. doesn't entail that she lives there; i.e., it doesn't entail that the proposition 'Ursula lives in Canada,' is true. In other words, x was standing in for a proposition.
For many years, I agreed with the logic of this statement. Just because you believe something doesn't make it real (note that i use "real", not "true").
But I've noticed that it is indeed possible for people "to believe a logical impossiblity", and to make it stronger, it's possible for people "to know a logical impossiblity".
Therefore the "one can't imagine 2+2=5" argument, which appears to be logical, isn't correct (and that's an amusing example of itself, isn't it?)
yrs, andreaswww.andreas.com
------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html