[liblouis-liblouisxml] Re: New Releases
- From: "John J. Boyer" <john.boyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 03:55:01 -0500
The latter option is what I would favor.
I suppose the user should be able to turn off logging, but I think that s/he
should be told that it would be unwise in most circumstances.
John
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 09:41:24AM +0100, Michael Whapples wrote:
> What to do if no callback is given is a good question.
>
> One might suggest that the logging stuff does not get called (IE.
> its a way to turn off logging).
>
> Another option is to have a default callback, which could be lou_logPrint.
>
> I think I am heading for the latter, but to enable turning off the
> logging one can set the logging callback to NULL.
>
> Does that sound reasonable?
>
> Michael Whapples
> On 28/04/2014 09:37, John J. Boyer wrote:
> >I had proposed a releasee of liblouisutdml on May 1. However, I think
> >the work on logging should be completed and then liblouis and
> >liblouisutdml should be released together. I will be happy to have
> >Christian do the releases and put them on the liblouis website.
> >
> >On logging, I understood the advantages when Keith explained that it
> >was much better to use a callback than a logging file. The file gave
> >me trouble also. I'm wondering what happens if no callbacck is given.
> >Shouldn't the behavior be the same as it is now?
> >
> >John
> >
>
> For a description of the software, to download it and links to
> project pages go to http://www.abilitiessoft.com
--
John J. Boyer; President, Chief Software Developer
Abilitiessoft, Inc.
http://www.abilitiessoft.com
Madison, Wisconsin USA
Developing software for people with disabilities
For a description of the software, to download it and links to
project pages go to http://www.abilitiessoft.com
Other related posts:
