[liblouis-liblouisxml] Re: New Releases
- From: "Michael Whapples" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "mwhapples@xxxxxxx" for DMARC)
- To: liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 09:41:24 +0100
What to do if no callback is given is a good question.
One might suggest that the logging stuff does not get called (IE. its a
way to turn off logging).
Another option is to have a default callback, which could be lou_logPrint.
I think I am heading for the latter, but to enable turning off the
logging one can set the logging callback to NULL.
Does that sound reasonable?
Michael Whapples
On 28/04/2014 09:37, John J. Boyer wrote:
I had proposed a releasee of liblouisutdml on May 1. However, I think
the work on logging should be completed and then liblouis and
liblouisutdml should be released together. I will be happy to have
Christian do the releases and put them on the liblouis website.
On logging, I understood the advantages when Keith explained that it
was much better to use a callback than a logging file. The file gave
me trouble also. I'm wondering what happens if no callbacck is given.
Shouldn't the behavior be the same as it is now?
John
For a description of the software, to download it and links to
project pages go to http://www.abilitiessoft.com
Other related posts:
