[LRflex] Re: Introduction
- From: David Simms <simmszee@xxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:12:28 -0800 (PST)
Que c'est complique cette photographie digitale !
Thanks for the interpretation. I'll have to reread it a few times. By the way,
I need to find the accents somewhere in Yahoo.
Merci beaucoup,
Dave
________________________________
From: "philippe.amard@xxxxxx" <philippe.amard@xxxxxx>
To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tue, November 24, 2009 2:58:54 AM
Subject: [LRflex] Re: Introduction
May I run the risk of adding to (the circle of) confusion?
4/3 is not half or quarter or more or less format - it is plainly Full Frame
for lenses specifically designed for 4/3s ... even though the sensor is smaller
(not the pixel count - current 4/3s have higher PC than most DSLR had two years
ago) ... only non 4/3 lenses do not use their full 'coverage' potential to the
extent stated in the ratios already listed.
I guess the physics teacher in you can get this change of perpective witout
choking too much (wink)
Of course, the 4/3 have other issues, this I cannot in fairness deny, but
micro 4/3s seem to open many roads for lovers of older time lenses, name it,
you can fit it...
Bien cordialement de Metz
Philippe
========================================
Message du 24/11/09 11:04
De : "Miha Golobic" <miha.golobic@xxxxxxxxx>
A : leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Copie à :
Objet : [LRflex] Re: Introduction
Hello David Simms,
4/3 also happens to be an open standard, with many adapters available, but is
not half frame or 50% of the area of a standard 35mm frame; it's quarter frame.
35mm 1x Full Frame
Leica DMR 1.37x 52% (half frame)
Nikon DX 1.52x 43%
4/3 System 2x 25% (qurter-frame)
Welcome to the list!
Miha
__________________________________________________________________
Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr!
http://www.flickr.com/gift/
Other related posts:
