I totally agree with trying out trac, It's major hurdle is hosting,
and that's only because it needs either sql light or posgresql both
of which are easy to overcome. Adiumx is a perfect example of a trac
site, they use it well.
-Francis
On Jan 27, 2006, at 6:32 AM, numE wrote:
We could swap to another hoster later... if there are problems.
another thing we should definitly look at is the so called "trac system".
it's much better than the default sourceforge thing.
here you can see it in action: trac.adiumx.com (adiumx is an osx instant messager probably all of you know) ;-)
Francis Gulotta schrieb:This is really cool, but I don't know if they offer svn to every project yet or if it's still in trial. Just look out for it. -Francis
On Jan 27, 2006, at 6:22 AM, themacuser wrote:
I'm signing up a project page on sourceforge now. Do you want to be an admin on the project too? Sign up at http://sf.net and tell me your username. On 27/01/2006, at 9:48 PM, themacuser wrote:
Excellent! I like it. Now how did I not think of that? On 27/01/2006, at 9:43 PM, numE wrote:
What about KisMac Reloaded? :-)
themacuser schrieb:I was thinking we should go with sourceforge - that's where most opensource projects go. Does anyone else think we should/shouldn't?
If we do want to fork off KisMac, we sould change the project name I
guess.
KisMac seemed to be non open-source in the early days before SVN...
The SVN release seems to be named KisMacNG (NG standing for next generation?)
How about calling the release "KisMacTG" as in third generation?
On 27/01/2006, at 1:47 AM, numE wrote:
It seems like there are some people willing to restart the development of kismac.
What about setting up a new SVN server + bugtracker etc? this is a very nice system: http://trac.edgewall.com/
the adiumx guys use it, too.
Francis Gulotta reconbot@xxxxxxx I'm just this guy, you know?
Francis Gulotta reconbot@xxxxxxx I'm just this guy, you know?