What about KisMac Reloaded? :-) themacuser schrieb: > I was thinking we should go with sourceforge - that's where most > opensource projects go. > Does anyone else think we should/shouldn't? > > If we do want to fork off KisMac, we sould change the project name I > guess. > > KisMac seemed to be non open-source in the early days before SVN... > > The SVN release seems to be named KisMacNG (NG standing for next > generation?) > > How about calling the release "KisMacTG" as in third generation? > > On 27/01/2006, at 1:47 AM, numE wrote: > >> It seems like there are some people willing >> to restart the development of kismac. >> >> What about setting up a new SVN server + bugtracker etc? >> this is a very nice system: >> http://trac.edgewall.com/ >> >> the adiumx guys use it, too. >> >>