I was thinking we should go with sourceforge - that's where most
opensource projects go.
Does anyone else think we should/shouldn't?
If we do want to fork off KisMac, we sould change the project name I
guess.
KisMac seemed to be non open-source in the early days before SVN...
The SVN release seems to be named KisMacNG (NG standing for next
generation?)
How about calling the release "KisMacTG" as in third generation?
On 27/01/2006, at 1:47 AM, numE wrote:
It seems like there are some people willing
to restart the development of kismac.
What about setting up a new SVN server + bugtracker etc?
this is a very nice system:
http://trac.edgewall.com/
the adiumx guys use it, too.
