Excellent! I like it. Now how did I not think of that? On 27/01/2006, at 9:43 PM, numE wrote:
What about KisMac Reloaded? :-)
themacuser schrieb:I was thinking we should go with sourceforge - that's where most opensource projects go. Does anyone else think we should/shouldn't?
If we do want to fork off KisMac, we sould change the project name I guess.
KisMac seemed to be non open-source in the early days before SVN...
The SVN release seems to be named KisMacNG (NG standing for next generation?)
How about calling the release "KisMacTG" as in third generation?
On 27/01/2006, at 1:47 AM, numE wrote:
It seems like there are some people willing to restart the development of kismac.
What about setting up a new SVN server + bugtracker etc? this is a very nice system: http://trac.edgewall.com/
the adiumx guys use it, too.