[kismac] Re: New SVN Server?!
- From: numE <numE@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: kismac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 12:50:08 +0100
I tried to contact mick serveral times in the past..
concerning universal binary support, etc...
i never got any response...
perhaps you'll have more luck...
Geoffrey Kruse schrieb:
> I hosted the cvs server for KisMac back in the day on my cable
> connection... I could possibly do the same for SVN but it would be
> nothing spectacular speed wise. Also just a thought, I'd wait to hear
> from Mick and get his thoughts on forking etc. It might just be
> easier to wait until he responds and use the current server setup,
> maybe adding trac. Adding admins to a project is a lot less work than
> forking.
>
> Geoff
> On Jan 27, 2006, at 7:42 AM, themacuser wrote:
>
>> The trouble is that trac requires a server. At the moment, gm2.ath.cx
>> is a bit small to handle something like svn managment or something
>> like trac. Can someone else offer a server? I've sent in an
>> application to SourceForge for the project, we might not end up
>> needing it, but we can use it just to provide downloads etc if need
>> be...
>>
>> Subversion is only available to some projects in a beta test, but
>> IME, subversion has no real differences from CVS in actual practice.
>> Some time around February is the planned release date for giving SVN
>> to everyone. That's not too far away.
>>
>> Anyone want to be a project admin and help set things up?
>>
>> On 27/01/2006, at 10:02 PM, numE wrote:
>>
>>> We could swap to another hoster later... if there are problems.
>>> another thing we should definitly look at is the so called "trac
>>> system".
>>> it's much better than the default sourceforge thing.
>>>
>>> here you can see it in action:
>>> trac.adiumx.com (adiumx is an osx instant messager probably all of you
>>> know) ;-)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Francis Gulotta schrieb:
>>>> This is really cool, but I don't know if they offer svn to every
>>>> project yet or if it's still in trial. Just look out for it.
>>>> -Francis
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 27, 2006, at 6:22 AM, themacuser wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm signing up a project page on sourceforge now. Do you want to be
>>>>> an admin on the project too? Sign up at http://sf.net and tell me
>>>>> your username.
>>>>> On 27/01/2006, at 9:48 PM, themacuser wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Excellent! I like it. Now how did I not think of that?
>>>>>> On 27/01/2006, at 9:43 PM, numE wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What about KisMac Reloaded? :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> themacuser schrieb:
>>>>>>>> I was thinking we should go with sourceforge - that's where most
>>>>>>>> opensource projects go.
>>>>>>>> Does anyone else think we should/shouldn't?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If we do want to fork off KisMac, we sould change the project
>>>>>>>> name I
>>>>>>>> guess.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> KisMac seemed to be non open-source in the early days before
>>>>>>>> SVN...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The SVN release seems to be named KisMacNG (NG standing for next
>>>>>>>> generation?)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How about calling the release "KisMacTG" as in third generation?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 27/01/2006, at 1:47 AM, numE wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It seems like there are some people willing
>>>>>>>>> to restart the development of kismac.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What about setting up a new SVN server + bugtracker etc?
>>>>>>>>> this is a very nice system:
>>>>>>>>> http://trac.edgewall.com/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> the adiumx guys use it, too.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Francis Gulotta
>>>> reconbot@xxxxxxx
>>>> I'm just this guy, you know?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Other related posts:
