Urias McCullough wrote:
Neither did i, sorry i should have been more precise. "Mean" was referring to accusatory mails i didn't answer to during the week, and a few directly associated me or my intention with some illuminated groups. I was shocked by Nicholas mail, but i was hurt by your last answer. Why mention religion, crackpot theories and fanatics if you're not trying to make a point? Why tell stories about some extremists if not to completely dismiss sane discussion? For me it's just another form of the Godwin point.On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Alexandre Deckner <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Ingo Weinhold wrote:Hey, calm down, Alex. Nobody called you either (at least as far as I recall). Urias certainly didn't.Well i'm sorry i recall that. I can take anything but i can't stand mean people.I certainly wasn't referring to you
/Alex
