"Karl vom Dorff" <karl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Jonas, Hi Karl, and everyone. :) > if you can find a panel of judges that might be a start. > I think a monthly frequency may be a bit too ambitious, > however maybe something like a quarterly prize would > be better. I'd rather have a sloppy weekly(!) prize than an over-engineered quarterly prize. More "Yay! We like you. Have a cookie." and less "Awesome Hacker. We bow to your leetness.". > I've noticed from the Source Activity CIA, there's seems to > be these bursts of activity and inspiration from developers. I suppose this happens when spare time and inspiration align. :) > Say for instance the time when Hugo committed all the network > code and patches. If you held this prize idea then, and say had > a pole with a bunch of devs on it asking which one deserved the > quarterly prize at the end of that quarter, most likely Hugo > would have gotten it; and rightly so. Probably. Not that we lack other people to reward. :) I find it interesting how people as a group seem to focus on one person, (seeking a leader?), like Axel or Hugo, elevating them beyond the rest, while Haiku remains a team effort. I wouldn't want a prize to send the message that the person's contribution was the only significant one during the time period. To me, 3 months is too long a time to "bake a cake" for one individual of the Haiku team / larger community. Only 4 persons a year could be shown appreciation this way. 12 opportunities per year look a lot more interesting to me. Or at least 6. Two persons, bi-monthly? Rewards don't have to be -so- serious, or even related to recent commits. We could even -sometimes- give awards to outsiders, like Maxim Shemanarev, the author of the Anti-Grain Geometry graphics library used by Haiku's app_server. I would try a panel of 3-5 persons suggesting candidates and then have the current donors choose one of those candidates. Do you think that would work, Karl? If there's a shortage of people interested I can volonteer for a panel. /Jonas.