On 21 May 2013 09:52, Matt Madia <mattmadia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On May 20, 2013 5:45 PM, "Jessica Hamilton" <jessica.l.hamilton@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Since the packagefs is read-only (thanks for the clarification, Ingo), I > agree with John of just putting a symlink in like apps already do. People > can re-organise how they like. > > That's the thing. With the symlink existing within the package, an user > based organization will not persist across reboots. Think of it like > modifying something from within a LiveCD boot. > > Just to clarify: I meant putting in a symlink on the non-virtual BFS volume, in case that was misconstrued :-)