Hello, On 6/8/2008, "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >It's not the role of Haiku Inc. to dictate any such thing; it's an >organisation to support the development of Haiku, and give it a legal >entity - as such, it does own the trademarks to the Haiku logo. >It also does not influence the direction of the development of Haiku in >any way (other than funding a specific direction), and it would also >not influence a hypothetically assimilated HaikuPorts; only the people >actually working on this project would set the direction. >So if we (ie. the Haiku developers and the HaikuPorts developers) would >think it's a good idea to make HaikuPorts a part of Haiku, then so be >it. This is starting to sound like an empty construct after all :) Anyway, I think we should not be worrying about making HaikuPorts an official part of the Haiku project or not. As is it, there is a clear interest from a number of Haiku devs in the HaikuPorts project. This results in the fact that there is already some sort of cooperation between the two projects. I believe this can benefit both and hope this cooperation will expand in the future. >it. I guess what Jorge meant with the above is just that the Haiku >developers probably wouldn't be interested to make HaikuPorts a part of >Haiku if it also contained ports for other operating systems like MacOS >X, or, let's say RiscOS. I think it's safe to assume that HaikuPorts is not going to support other operating systems. After all, we are all Haiku/BeOS enthusiasts. >While making HaikuPorts part of the Haiku project would also answer the >question of wether HaikuPorts could use the Haiku logo, that certainly >shouldn't be the driving force behind it. I agree. Best regards, Brecht