[gmpi] Re: Topic 4: Host Interface

  • From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 17:36:17 +0000

On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 05:36:32 -0000, Silver Blade wrote:
> For networking, GMPI should provide means of communication over the network.
> While this, in a sense, out-of-process, the only out-of-process thing about
> it is that we're using the platform's networking functions, and the plugin
> is on a different computer.

I disagree. Specifying the comms protocol is beyond the scope. Individual
hosts can do this (and agree amongst themselves how they want to achieve
it).
 
> While I know technologies such as ReWire already allow communication between
> separate processes, there must be a way of creating a library which can be
> loaded by the system and used by many processes - like a daemon/server.

IIUC Rewire doesn't communicate between processes. The 'apps' are infact
dynamically loaded objects.

- Steve 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: