[gmpi] Re: Reqs TODO
- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 18:16:33 +0000
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 11:29:31 +0100, Koen Tanghe wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff McClintock" <jeffmcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> > It just seems to me that by the time i've allocated more memory, extended
> > the timestamp to 64bit, added the block_start_clock (queried from the host
> > via a plain-C to C++ thunk), it would have been more efficient to just be
> > given a 64bit timestamp in the first place?
> >
> > What do you all think.
>
> I'd vote for 64-bit everywhere.
Agreed, I dont like having too different timestamp formats, its just
another source of complexity/confusion.
- Steve
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
