[gmpi] Re: Reqs TODO
- From: Marc Poirier <fipnid@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 05:30:33 -0800 (PST)
--- Steve Harris wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 02:03:55 -0800, Marc Poirier wrote:
> > Me too. In fact, I even would like to see us just agree on 64-bit
> > float for audio data, too, though I think that that's less likely
> > something that other folks will go for. Not too far down the line,
I'm
> > sure that you'll regret that, but oh well...
>
> Personally I think that having a single audio format is more important
> that what that format actually is (pending the outcome of a benchmark
> of course).
I agree, and that's what I was saying: I would like to see GMPI just do
one audio sample format, and I would like it to be 64-bit float. I think
that we'll feel really stupid about the decision to use 32-bit float in a
few year's time, if we do that. The performance difference will further
disappear (it already is a mixed bag; 64-bit is more efficient for some
things, 32-bit for other), arguments against 64-bit will become
irrelevant...
Marc
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
http://companion.yahoo.com/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
