[gmpi] Re: NAMM follow-up, some major decisions to make

  • From: Jeff McClintock <jeffmcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 14:57:50 +1300

Ron Kuper wrote:

How does this sound for a plan: 

Sounds good. Lets do it.  Enough talk.

Let's channel some of this energy into writting the API.

It's not like it's a huge task. The core VST API is what... 17 files, the core AudioEffect class is 7 pages of code.

Remember we're not actually writting a host here, just the API. The thin layer between host<-->plugin.

Jeff



[1] Take a roll call on this list of MMA members, or soon to join
members.

[2] Once a quorum of MMA members has been reached, set up private MMA
reflector.  (This reflector continues to stay open for public comment.)

[3] Establish source code repository.  Public gets read-only access and
can comment here.  MMA working group members get read-write access.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe




----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. gmpi
  3. Archive
  4. 01-2005