On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 01:02:11AM -0700, Chris Grigg wrote: > Yeah, fine, but I'm having trouble parsing you w/r/t what you're > saying about Mike's objection, you started out with 'primary > tenet...awkward to get multiple... responses...," but then you That was paraphrasing Mike, who found it very awkward to handle. > switched to timing -- is that secondary, then? Or is it that it's Timing is another issue, which also appears when we divorce UI from DSP. > not the necessity of plugs making and hosts handling the > setParameterAutomated() calls Mike objects to -- since there would be > similar calls in different places with Actors -- it's just that the > particular design of VST's setParameterAutomated() system sucks? setParameterAutomated() is non-causal, was what I THINK he was bitching about. Setting param P1 in an event would result in 1, 2, 3, 5, 100 calls to setParameterAutomated(). Mike, am I catching your intent? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission. Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe