[geocentrism] Re: Indian satellite

  • From: Neville Jones <njones@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 15:30:25 -0800

Before Apollo, Dr. Van Allen was saying that a manned mission to the Moon was impossible, because of the radiation belts that are named after him. After Apollo, he changed his opinion and admitted being 'wrong'.
This reversal is to be commended in an honest, truth-seeking scientist. However, his change of opinion was brought about by his belief that NASA would not lie about their 'achievements'. The only new 'evidence' that he had to base his new opinion on was the word of NASA and the ex-military men who were being recruited by NASA to be astronauts.
Again, this is quite normal human behaviour - we each have an in-built tendency to believe that people would not lie to us.
Having said all that, you must realize, Paul, that Dr. Van Allen's change of opinion, as reported by Wikidpedia, etc., does not prove anything scientifically. Of far greater weight is the evidence of the Space Shuttle crew who stated that, at an altitude of 350 miles, they had strong flashes in their eyes, even with their lids closed.
Neville
www.realityreviewed.com


-----Original Message-----
From: pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 06:39:10 +1000

But thats the whole point Paul..  I can only report from personal experience of a past time. Reports of what I read at the time..  I am not a conspiracy nut..  I worked for Nasa under contract via the Australian Government.  What I believed about the Van allen belt at that time, everybody I knew believed the same..  I would have been going against the stream had I said anything to the contrary..  Manned space travel would be extremely difficult if not impossible, except via a polar exit..  this was extremely depressing back then ..  During my teens I was always ridiculed as a nut.. yes, a space nut.. long before sputnick, which eventually vindicated me, but nary an apology.
 
Of course I have googled.... I had no reason to keep those ancient reports.  today I find no real evidence other than vague mention of the danger in Wiki, with it being as you said, insufficient to prevent a manned expedition....  then why do they not mention that they were wrong back then? That Van allen and all were mistaken?  
 
I find no mention of ancient history re this subject..  I will today dig deeper.... But I am confident, failing someone having an old document , there will be nothing..  Public libraries in this day and age regularly destroy older books,,,, to their shame... 
 
Philip.

Other related posts: