[geocentrism] Indian satellite

  • From: allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:22:21 -0800 (PST)

Particularly, since  the "ubiquitous" cosmic rays are in part the very 
radiation, who's intensity at and through the belt is the very question under 
consideration..:-D










--- On Tue, 11/11/08, Neville Jones <njones@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Neville Jones <njones@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Indian satellite
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tuesday, November 11, 2008, 11:46 AM



Paul,

And your point?

Cosmic rays cause damage to electronic circuitry, so why did they not do any 
damage aboard Apollo? And we are exposed to cosmic rays here on terra firma, 
but I, for one, do not register flashes in my eyes.

Either way, dismissing the core argument with, 'ah, they're just cosmic rays' 
skirts the issue.

Neville
www.realityreviewed.com




-----Original Message-----
From: paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:41:46 +0000 (GMT)
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Indian satellite






Neville J
Space vehicle crews have been reporting these 'flashes in their eyes' for quite 
a while. My most recent recollection of this phenomenon suggests that cosmic 
rays are thought to be the cause. And of course cosmic rays are ubiquitous.
Paul D






From: Neville Jones <njones@xxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, 10 November, 2008 11:30:25 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Indian satellite


Before Apollo, Dr. Van Allen was saying that a manned mission to the Moon was 
impossible, because of the radiation belts that are named after him. After 
Apollo, he changed his opinion and admitted being 'wrong'.

This reversal is to be commended in an honest, truth-seeking scientist. 
However, his change of opinion was brought about by his belief that NASA would 
not lie about their 'achievements'. The only new 'evidence' that he had to base 
his new opinion on was the word of NASA and the ex-military men who were being 
recruited by NASA to be astronauts.

Again, this is quite normal human behaviour - we each have an in-built tendency 
to believe that people would not lie to us.

Having said all that, you must realize, Paul, that Dr. Van Allen's change of 
opinion, as reported by Wikidpedia, etc., does not prove anything 
scientifically. Of far greater weight is the evidence of the Space Shuttle crew 
who stated that, at an altitude of 350 miles, they had strong flashes in their 
eyes, even with their lids closed.

Neville
www.realityreviewed.com
 


 
Free 3D Marine Aquarium Screensaver
Watch dolphins, sharks & orcas on your desktop! Check it out at 
www.inbox.com/marineaquarium

Other related posts: