[geocentrism] Re: Geosynchronous satellites paper
- From: Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 12:35:31 -0700 (PDT)
My Comments in blue...
Of the 28 moons whose rotation is experimentally known, only 3 are NOT
phase-locked with their orbit ? that is, like our Moon, the same side faces the
primary planet.
Not only do the periods of rotation and revolution have a Diophantine
(integral) relationship, the integers are all one!
Two are moons of Jupiter, one of Saturn.
MS claims the phase-locking resonance occurred during the gas cloud
condensation of the solar system over billions of years, because the moons are
spheroids - not perfect spheres. So the 3 moons not phase-locked must be
perfectly round??. But where?s that experimental proof?
Anyway, we know that they were created that way and maintained by the aether
.
Reference: http://www.solarviews.com/eng/data1.htm#orb
Yea..thats a doozzie...im not sure any model could account for that untill
perhaps you get down to the very fine details or effects and nature of grav &or
vibartional forces...This is to say that i dont think a answerer to this
question could be satisfactorly given at this point in time..The reason is
untill the exact nature of grav was worked out the the only answere one could
give in the short term is as you said God made them and put them that way in
the firmiment ..but it is imortaint not to forget that the mechanics of why or
how they stay that way is still at this point a local and or micro phenomeon in
the macro schem of things ..but having said that it would be interesting to
see what all that looks like from a earth centered perspective ...we have the
flower pattern for the planets themselfs but what would that look like with the
moons too.......im thinking out loud but in the case of all the moons even the
ones in phase lock they are still in real roation
relitive to the ARF (earth) i wonder if there is a connection to the planets
orbit of earth and its moons orbital period/ maybe this might be a case of
making the wrong correlations as a result there is no meaningfull understanding
to this phenomena as well........we may have to recalculate all those figures
using the Earth as the reference point rathen then the planitary body itself
before any meaningfull data arise..This in fact may be a golden oortunity for
us.... if we could identify what the right corelations should be in order to
understand this it might be a further "indication" of the GS postion kinda like
the orderly flower pattern ..where taken form another perspective is close but
not as orderly or beutifull as when taken from earth...? I think at this point
we dont know enough about grav to extrapolate usfull mechanical meaning from
this effect. However, i do think this is probably a case of looking at an
object upside down in a mirror while moving
backwards.... finding the right perspecitve will be the key to making sense of
all that.....i know this is just some wild speculation but wild speculation is
obviously the best that anyone including MS in any model can do right now....?
.
Robert Bennett <robert.bennett@xxxxxxx> wrote:
I would add this as well.....?it may accurately describe what we see but it
cannot determine the reason for it..and this from
http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Titius-Bode_law There is no solid
theoretical explanation of the Titius-Bode law, but it is likely a combination
of orbital resonance and shortage of degrees of freedom: any stable planetary
system has a high probability of satisfying a Titius-Bode-type relationship.
Because of this, it has been called a "rule" rather than a "law".
Astrophysicist Alan Boss states that it is just a coincidence. The planetary
science journal Icarus no longer accepts papers attempting to provide
'improved' versions of the law. . Orbital resonance from major orbiting
bodies creates regions around the Sun that are free of long-term stable orbits.
Results from simulations of planetary formation support the idea that a
randomly chosen stable planetary system will likely statisfy a Titius-Bode law.
Now when taking the planitary orbits as seen from a central earth the flower
pattern is far more convencing in terms of vibrational effects then in any
newtonian grav framework ...
Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Titusâ??Bode law
my thoughts
1. is only demonstratable for certain in the teara system wich is local to
and at the center of the universe.... it is posible that the law is only the
realtionship of the bodies cloest to the cneter and not a universal law .
2. it would depend on the tuning effect that the planitary bodies have in
relation to the frequecy of the grav wave and aether itsef and that is what we
dont have.
3.I belive in order to answere this question we would need to know. that as
well as. the location for the sorce of the grav vibration perhiferial or from
the centere
4.I think there is hope yet but those issues would have to be modled and
extropolated first.....
Robert Bennett <robert.bennett@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Could we have the frequency of the aether from the tides?
Neville.
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
Of the 28 moons whose rotation is experimentally known, only 3 are NOT
phase-locked with their orbit ? that is, like our Moon, the same side faces the
primary planet.
Not only do the periods of rotation and revolution have a Diophantine
(integral) relationship, the integers are all one!
Two are moons of Jupiter, one of Saturn.
MS claims the phase-locking resonance occurred during the gas cloud
condensation of the solar system over billions of years, because the moons are
spheroids - not perfect spheres. So the 3 moons not phase-locked must be
perfectly round??. But where?s that experimental proof?
Anyway, we know that they were created that way and maintained by the aether
.
Reference: http://www.solarviews.com/eng/data1.htm#orb
Any ideas, Allen? or anybody?
Robert B
On Behalf Of Allen Daves
I would add this as well.....?it may accurately describe what we see but it
cannot determine the reason for it..and this from
http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Titius-Bode_law
There is no solid theoretical explanation of the Titius-Bode law, but it is
likely a combination of orbital resonance and shortage of degrees of freedom:
any stable planetary system has a high probability of satisfying a
Titius-Bode-type relationship. Because of this, it has been called a "rule"
rather than a "law". Astrophysicist Alan Boss states that it is just a
coincidence. The planetary science journal Icarus no longer accepts papers
attempting to provide 'improved' versions of the law. .
Orbital resonance from major orbiting bodies creates regions around the Sun
that are free of long-term stable orbits. Results from simulations of planetary
formation support the idea that a randomly chosen stable planetary system will
likely statisfy a Titius-Bode law.
Now when taking the planitary orbits as seen from a central earth the flower
pattern is far more convencing in terms of vibrational effects then in any
newtonian grav framework ...
Other related posts:
