[GeoStL] Re: Foo Foo The Snoo....

  • From: "Mike Griffin" <griff@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 10:58:28 -0500

-
Sad thing is.. He is probably watching this and having a good laugh at our 
expense..
I am tired of discussing Foo..

Has anyone seen this?

http://www.geocreed.info/

Good info and certainly what we should live by... (No, It has nothing about 
signing logs) :-)


Mike

Tired of Spam??
Here's your solution..
See: http://www.spamarrest.com/affl?4001050

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <bromley@xxxxxxx>
To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 10:30 AM
Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Foo Foo The Snoo....


-
It's like cheating at solitare.  How much fun is that?  People still do it 
and
it doesn't make it right.

If Foo Foo wants to see his hit count above everyone else the he'll have his 
15
minutes of fame.  What it does do is cheapen the efforts of everyone who has
legitimately found the cache and signed the log.  Some of the caches that 
Foo
Foo has claimed he found were difficult ones that gave the legitimate 
finders a
great sense of satisfaction when they actually signed the log.  That effort 
is
cheapened by someone who states that he "dropped by" to pick up a 4/4.  It
takes a great deal of effort and preparation than a "drop by" on a lot of
these.  The owners have done a significant amount of work to prepare for and
hide the caches.  They shouldn't be cheapened by a pretender.  If you were
actually there, sign the log and prove it to everyone. The cache owners have
every right to delete the logs and in my opinion, they should.

Steve aka javapgmr

Quoting Barbara Kryvko <barbarastl@xxxxxxxxxxx>:

> -
> I would certainly police myself that way, but don't see it as my business 
> to
> police others. Geocaching is, and should remain, an "on your honor" 
> system.
> Sure, there will be some like Foo Foo who just log a bunch, but they'll go
> away soon - how much fun can that be, anyway?
>
> Barbara
>
> ---- Mike Griffin <griff@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > -
> > Good point.. However, I feel that if you cannot take the time to sign 
> > the
> > book, what validation is there that you have been to the cache? Most 
> > logs
> > usually go TNLNSL - So swapping items is not necessarily required and it 
> > is
> > indicated as is SL. I have seen logbooks that have people signing that
> never
> > logged it online. I can certainly accept that. I cannot accept people 
> > not
> > signing the log book when they say they found the cache. It would be
> > terrible if everyone started doing this. Groundspeak wouldn't be able to
> > keep up with the number crunchers who might have visited the area but 
> > never
> > really found it. I say stand firm and delete!
> >
> > Mike
>
>
>  ****************************************
>  For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from this
>  list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
>  Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived  http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
>
>




-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP at http://webmail.htc.net

Get your local news on the net at http://portal.htc.net



 ****************************************
 For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from this
 list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
 Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived  http://tinyurl.com/87cqw



 

 ****************************************
 For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from this
 list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching 
 Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived  http://tinyurl.com/87cqw

Other related posts: