Re: [foxboro] FBM230 and DH+
- From: Donato Azevedo <donatoaz@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:46:42 -0300
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Johnson, Alex P (IOM)
<Alex.Johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> To my knowledge, the KF adapter is required to (among other things) adapt to
> the very different physical layer of the AB network.
>
> Since the FDSI FBM 230 supports only serial links something is needed to
> bridge the gap.
>
> What's the issue with using the adapter?
There isn't really an issue (I actually already have them). But I was
told by a co-worker that foxboro released as an update a change that
would allow an FBM230 to be integrated without the need for the KF2.
He also told me that there are no *significant* differences between
the physical layers. But I suppose he could be wrong.
I'll do some more research on this...
--
Donato Azevedo
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
