[cryptome] Re: cryptome compromised?
- From: "Joe Products" <Joe_Products@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:39:08 +0200 (CEST)
Cryptome is not compromied
---------- Původní zpráva ----------
Od: James Jacobs <freegovinfo@xxxxxxxxx>
Komu: cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Datum: 10. 6. 2014 7:02:41
Předmět: [cryptome] Re: cryptome compromised?
"
latest crawl in the Internet Archive’s wayback machine is May 20:
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://cryptome.org/
(http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://cryptome.org/)
James
On Jun 9, 2014, at 9:51 PM, Shaun O'Connor <capricorn8159@xxxxxxxxx
(mailto:capricorn8159@xxxxxxxxx)> wrote:
"
mirrors as well unfortunately.
On 10/06/2014 04:04, shelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(mailto:shelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
"
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014, at 07:01 PM, Aftermath wrote:
"
yea, i think we are all curious as to the nature of the outage. is it
just
me or are mirrors down as well?
"
This is the only one that's up & has recent activity (<a
href='http://akashmanews.com'>akashmanews.com</a>
mirror's archive is a year old):
<a
href='http://cryptomeorg.siteprotect.net/'>http://cryptomeorg.siteprotect.net/</a>
"
On Monday, June 9, 2014, Maarten Billemont <> wrote:
"
Does cryptome provide any sort of canary?
— Maarten Billemont (lhunath) —
me: – business: –
On Jun 9, 2014, at 20:35, John Young <
<a><javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','');></a>> wrote:
Yes, down.
" "
.
"
--
PRIVACY IS A BASIC RIGHT - NOT A CONCESSION
"
"
Other related posts:
