[cryptome] Re: cryptome compromised?
- From: shelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 20:55:04 -0700
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014, at 08:26 PM, Jarrod B wrote:
> Well this has really put me in a bad mood today. I've never really had
> the
> need for a secure email address, but I think I've been inspired to set
> one
> up,......
>
> Not happy and sensing something sinister going on.
>
Don't despair just yet. There may be a simpler explanation.
Re: using free email: The spooks just take everything anyway (as the
fiber optic splitters in Room 641A have shown, etc.), but one makes it
much easier for the bastards by using google/yahoo/msft's "free" email
(where the companies are compelled to be complicit, and *you* are the
product), and by not using encryption. Sure, the ciphers have probably
been intentionally weakened, but why make it easy for them?
I've been using a non-USA email provider for many years, but it really
makes no difference when they tap the Internet backbone and just steal
everything. If you have need to transmit sensitive communication, doing
it online is just not safe.
-S
>
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:04 PM, <> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 9, 2014, at 07:01 PM, Aftermath wrote:
> > > yea, i think we are all curious as to the nature of the outage. is it
> > > just
> > > me or are mirrors down as well?
> > >
> >
> > This is the only one that's up & has recent activity (akashmanews.com
> > mirror's archive is a year old):
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Monday, June 9, 2014, Maarten Billemont <> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Does cryptome provide any sort of canary?
> > > >
> > > > — Maarten Billemont (lhunath) —
> > > > me: – business: –
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Jun 9, 2014, at 20:35, John Young <
> > > > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','');>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Yes, down.
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
Other related posts:
