[cryptome] Re: cryptome compromised?
- From: "A A" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "ynn005@xxxxxxxxx" for DMARC)
- To: "cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 13:00:21 -0700 (PDT)
I figure the domain/archive was closed intentionally and replaced with a temp
site at cryptomeorg.siteprotect.net as a reminder of the value of the site
during the kickstarter campaign? Perhaps site would then re-open at end of
campaign with improved design?
On Tuesday, June 10, 2014 1:55 PM, Shaun O'Connor <capricorn8159@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
great hope the mystery can be solved, I will ping the site regularly to see if
that wonderfully annoying error message decides to disssapear in farour of a
perusable site..
On 10/06/2014 15:39, Douglas Rankine wrote:
Hi Shaun,
>John has responded on the list and said that the website is
down. He is probably busy finding out the problem and getting
it and running again.
>ATB
>Dougie.
>On Jun 10, 2014 2:32 PM, Shaun O'Connor <capricorn8159@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
just a thought on that but i could be way off the mark, I wonder if there is a
link between the 403 error and the ks campaign.
On 10/06/2014 14:26, Brian Hecht wrote:
8:30 CST Texas time ...
>
>
>cryptome.org still showing the 403 ...
>
>
>sort of a sinking feeling in my stomach
>
>
>Brian
>
>
>
>
>
>
>________________________________
> From: Aftermath <aftermath.thegreat@xxxxxxxxx>
>To: cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 6:17 PM
>Subject: [cryptome] Re: cryptome compromised?
>
>
>
>Hmm.. no official comment from John Young yet. I hope hes not being detained.
>I almost suspect something bad happend
>
>
>
>On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:14 PM, In Harms Way <11414150173@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>http://www.scmagazine.com/notorious-hacker-guccifer-sentenced-in-romania/article/354838
>>Notorious hacker Guccifer sentenced in Romania - SC Magazine
>>
>>--
We have nothing to hide, but something to protect:
LIBERTY, PRIVACY & FREEDOM
- and the people, whose human rights these are.
>
>
>
--
PRIVACY IS A BASIC RIGHT - NOT A CONCESSION
--
PRIVACY IS A BASIC RIGHT - NOT A CONCESSION
Other related posts:
