[cryptome] Re: Cryptome: Error 403
- From: Neal Lamb <nl1816a@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 13:14:10 -0700 (PDT)
403: Forbidden
This error message is generated when the web server is trying to access a file
that does not exist or has been configured incorrectly
Troubleshooting suggestions:
Ensure that you have a valid home page defined in your website
directory (example: /htdocs/index.html, /htdocs/index.php). On Unix,
this is case sensitive and must be all lower case.
In your Account Manager, under Hosting Tools, click to .Reset File
Permissions..
On Monday, June 9, 2014 3:06 PM, doug <douglasrankine2001@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear John Young & Colleagues,
Anyone know why I keep getting error 403 when I visit the cryptome
website?
ATB
Douglas Rankine.
On 09/06/14 20:51, Jarrod B wrote:
So is this why I'm getting a 403 message when i go to cryptome .org?
>
>
>
>
>On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Neal Lamb <nl1816a@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>http://ecowatch.com/2014/06/06/china-coal-cap-strand-assets/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>On Monday, June 9, 2014 11:55 AM, Aftermath <aftermath.thegreat@xxxxxxxxx>
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>Some one just pointed this out too me:
>>
>>
>>https://veracrypt.codeplex.com/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>from the website:
>>
>>
>>Project Description
>>VeraCrypt is a free disk encryption software brought to you by IDRIX
>>(http://www.idrix.fr) and that is based on TrueCrypt, freely available at
>>http://www.truecrypt.org/.
>>It adds enhanced security to the algorithms used for system and partitions
>>encryption making it immune to new developments in brute-force attacks.
>>
>>For example, when the system partition is encrypted, TrueCrypt uses
>>PBKDF2-RIPEMD160 with 1000 iterations whereas in VeraCrypt we use 327661. And
>>for standard containers and other partitions, TrueCrypt uses at most 2000
>>iterations but VeraCrypt uses 655331 for RIPEMD160 and 500000 iterations for
>>SHA-2 and Whirlpool.
>>
>>This enhanced security adds some delay only to the opening of encrypted
>>partitions without any performance impact to the application use phase. This
>>is acceptable to the legitimate owner but it makes it much more harder for an
>>attacker to gain access to the encrypted data.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>VeraCrypt storage format is INCOMPATIBLE with TrueCrypt storage format.
>>VeraCrypt storage format is INCOMPATIBLE with TrueCrypt storage format.
>>
>>VeraCrypt storage format is INCOMPATIBLE with TrueCrypt storage format.
>>
>>
>>
>>(repetition is mine to highlight the fact that you cannot open truecrypt
>>volumes with veracrypt)
>>
>>
>>-Afterm4th
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 9:50 AM, <tpb-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Message du 03/06/14 10:51
>>>> De : "Shaun O'Connor"
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I take your point about
the encryption dilemma(did I
spell that
>>>> correctly). I think the
Jury is out on that particular
issue though...
>>>>
>>>> Personally I think we are
in a perpetual game of cat and
mouse with
>>>> those who make it their
business to know everything
about everyone..
>>>>
>>>
>>>
The rewards for the spies are too great for this game to end one day.
>>>
>>>The game will continue, but
because of these disclosures by
half-2015, the spies will have
to start all over again, at
least against people who are
aware and actively protect their
systems. Because those that got
legacy systems will be forever
under the treat.
>>>
>>>Considering our increasing life
expectancy and the fact that we
are using Cobol and Fortran
codes made 40 years ago in many
financial and scientific
institutions, we can count many
exploits discovered in the last
decade to be still exploitable
in 100 years. Because those
systems won't go away.
>>>
>>>An example of why this is
possible, is how many webservers
(not merely firmware routers
hard to re-flash) you will find
that are still vulnerable to
heartbleed. The rate of
correction seems to be
asymptotic, thus always leaving
some uncorrected systems till
the end of their usable lives.
>>>
>>>Put that in an automated system
like spy agencies have, and you
have interesting data streams
forever to exploit. The only
solution to stop them is to
uncover their taps and block
them, those are much smaller in
number and easier to tackle than
millions of machines.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Other related posts:
