RE: hi
- From: Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 13:44:50 +0200
The good news is that our tax system is pretty efficient.
On 4 Mar 2014 13:38, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Why is sars so kuk full wtf? Im running outa mana quick when i spin. How
> did ppl keep up the spin for so long in vanilla d3?
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:12:59 +0200
> Subject: Re: hi
> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> > What would you say if Infiltration didn't change his tactic? That he is
> just stupid? Or what if Sanford had changed his tactic and Infiltration
> didn't?
>
> You're overcomplicating it and looking at it in the wrong way. Remember,
> Infiltration was just reacting to Sanford Kelly. He was just remembered
> the situation from before and progressively punished harder after getting
> hit by it once. There wasn't a big tactical aspect behind it. He just
> adapted to what Sanford was doing. There's no luck involved either. Given
> the number of options players have at that range, it's extremely hard to
> perform a counter on reaction. You have to place that counter higher in
> your memory bank. Remember how we played once and you hit me with a focus
> attack, and then afterwards I kept punishing it with an Ultra? Same
> thing. The difference is that the way Infiltration handled it there was no
> easy way for him to get baited into punishing incorrectly. cr.mk xx
> tatsu would work even if Sanford Kelly backdashed, so would cr.hk xx
> demon.
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:03 AM, Grei Botes <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I suppose "I don't know".
>
> Pah, I know it sounds silly but if I changed what I did every time I got
> hit by something, I'm not respecting the fact the guy probably has
> something else up his sleeve to "counter my counter".
>
> I just use a "penalty shootout" mentality to deal with mixups. If I always
> go left as goalie, whether you know it or not, eventually you will shoot
> left, at least once, even if you KNOW shooting right seems to be the best
> option. Its called probability matching, and its generally inherent in any
> living organism.
>
> Anyway, after the blocked shot, the general option by the shooter will be
> to switch back to the winning option... but that is when the goalie changes
> too! This usually shatters the morale of the shooter... or at least gives
> me a nice comfortable spot "inside his head", although I didn't do a single
> thing.
>
> Its the same reason that I prefer to "air to air" a guy then use an
> anti-air, because that means I 'knew' you were going to jump and that is
> scary. DP could just be from reaction.
>
> TL:DR, I try and get you used to be me being silly and then turn smart. It
> catches you unawares and you lose the match :-)
>
> Doesn't work on guys who stick to their guns though.
>
> So totally is luck, rather than adaption. What would you say if
> Infiltration didn't change his tactic? That he is just stupid? Or what if
> Sanford had changed his tactic and Infiltration didn't?
>
> Anyway, there are probably arguments for and against what I'm saying,
> doesn't really matter.
>
>
>
Other related posts:
