Will MGS: ground zeroes be part of the final game? maybe on the same disc kinda thing? if it's the intro/demo thing? On 5 February 2014 15:10, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Well wasnt going to be a "big" demo from the start? > > Kinda like the ship segment from MGS2. Cant remember it ever being > advertised as a proper game. > > > Thats how I understood it from the start... > > ------------------------------ > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 13:04:32 +0000 > > > Lol, 5min for a speedrun. No doubt 4 of those 5 minutes are spend hiding. > > > > Two hours of game, with 5minutes of actual gameplay. Yup, sounds like MGS... > > Hopefully they will have a heavy pseudo-intellectual storyline to go along > with it. > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Ilitirit Sama > *Sent:* 05 February 2014 2:50 PM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > > > > Disappointment of the week > > > http://metro.co.uk/2014/02/05/metal-gear-solid-v-ground-zeroes-is-only-2-hours-long-4291338/ > > > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Wow, someone released the Art of Fighting source code (without assets, > of course) > > https://app.box.com/s/5on2e593tqt2c8ketc68 > > > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Watched it live. It will be on their YouTube channel in the next day or > so. > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9yHaajDKNc > > > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Sean Carrington < > theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Link -_- > > > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Did anyone watch Infiltration vs Tokido? Highest level of Akuma play > I've seen. SFIV is relatively slow but it's so demanding on fast reactions > and situational awareness. In one situation Tokido did a combo into reset > and which he knew would trade if Infiltration did a DP. He did this > because he was calculating the stun values in his head. Infiltration went > for the DP, it traded and Tokido got the dizzy. So pro. > > > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Sounds like he was having a pretty horrible nightmare. > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Ilitirit Sama > *Sent:* 05 February 2014 1:11 PM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > *Subject:* Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > > > > Go back to sleep. > > > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Sean Carrington < > theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Did someone say SFxT ? > > > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:04 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Gamernet House, 45 Salisbury Road, Cape Town, ZA > > > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Jack Steel <orichih@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Let me know were as it is my 1st time > > > On 2/5/14, Jack Steel <orichih@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reason y i have xbox and ps3 was 4 kof 13 but i did not get copy i had > > sfxt found 1 sa player further no1.that's y i was gears of war player > > now im stuck on ggpo 4 competition toying around. > > > > On 2/5/14, Jack Steel <orichih@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Im gonna start of slow c im new 2 group im sa and friendly .i had a > >> copy of kof 12 but i need a copy of kof 13 i got xbox and ps3 and will > >> soon upgrade graphic card 4 pc. To cover most platforms c what games r > >> famous 2 play.train.and thn c it sound interesting.ill try 2 come 2 > >> belville 2 get use 2 the flow. > >> > >> On 2/5/14, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> I remember playing you on GGPO. My user name is ilitirit but I don't > >>> play > >>> on there any more cos my GGPO doesn't work. We play on SupArc now. > >>> It's > >>> like GGPO but you can play against 3 people in a lobby if you want to. > >>> > >>> Are you going to come to the Saturday sessions in Bellville? > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Jack Steel <orichih@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>>> My ggpo user is goku1up- and finalfighter i smashed many ggpo kof 2002 > >>>> players avk team sa and other locals they tried all cheats 2 no profit > >>>> i hope to get smashed in kof13 and other platforms.smash or b > >>>> smashed"d.^_^;) > >>>> > >>>> On 2/3/14, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> > I wonder if they would have done the same if it was me? > >>>> > > >>>> > Or would they be all like... call the hospital, this man is about to > >>>> have a > >>>> > heart-attack. > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Sean Carrington > >>>> > <theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx > >>>> >> wrote: > >>>> > > >>>> >> I think I'm troubled. > >>>> >> > >>>> >> I might have cursed one too many times at the GM of Telkom > >>>> >> Claremont. > >>>> >> I was escorted out of the mall by security... *facepalm*. > >>>> >> On 03 Feb 2014 4:02 PM, "G B" <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> >> > >>>> >>> "subjective prices" - I mean that they are priced subjectively... > >>>> >>> See > >>>> >>> DeBont and Thaler (1985)'s classic overreaction hypothesis, or > >>>> >>> google > >>>> >>> anything on herding, as a basic yet 'oh so' applicable example. > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 3:52 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>>> Never heard of Peter Stone. Can you send me the title of the > >>>> >>>> article > >>>> or > >>>> >>>> the pdf? I'd love to read it. > >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> The reason why its frequently mentioned/used within the Hedge > Fund > >>>> >>>> industry is due to how rapidly HFs change, as can be seen in the > >>>> >>>> quant > >>>> >>>> meltdown of 2007 (In three days, you could've made R1 turn into > >>>> >>>> R500, > >>>> >>>> if > >>>> >>>> you were at the right place at the right time). Testing for > >>>> >>>> adaption > >>>> >>>> here > >>>> >>>> is extremely interesting, and saves you years of work. HFs is > also > >>>> >>>> the > >>>> >>>> canary in the coal mine in world of finance. > >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> You are spot on with the over-fitting issue. :-) I corrected this > >>>> >>>> when > >>>> >>>> I > >>>> >>>> implemented mine. When using fundamental analysis, they'd > >>>> >>>> implement > >>>> >>>> like, > >>>> >>>> 15 different fundamental metrics, of which maybe 4 or 5 have any > >>>> >>>> statical > >>>> >>>> significance. In fact, certain researchers went to the extent of > >>>> running > >>>> >>>> a > >>>> >>>> GA to select the variables for "best-fit" first... which is akin > >>>> >>>> to > >>>> >>>> data-mining in the sense that they are finding the best variables > >>>> >>>> that > >>>> >>>> fit > >>>> >>>> with the given data BEFORE running the algorithm. > >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> And yes, the evolutionary algorithm is trained using a data-base > >>>> first, > >>>> >>>> before it goes live. Typically, the GA selects the variables and > >>>> >>>> the > >>>> ANN > >>>> >>>> is > >>>> >>>> what does all the decision making. Having the computer decide > what > >>>> >>>> it > >>>> >>>> should do for both is unwise, or at least, I think so. > >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> Like I said, you put garbage in, you going to get garbage out, > >>>> >>>> that > >>>> >>>> is > >>>> >>>> how it works with these black box machines, so yeah, people have > >>>> >>>> used > >>>> >>>> GA's > >>>> >>>> before, but like we both mentioned, how you program it and I > would > >>>> >>>> is > >>>> >>>> totally different, which means it would learn differently, just > as > >>>> >>>> we > >>>> >>>> do. > >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> You also mentioned "Buy-Low/Sell-High" when there are economic > >>>> >>>> shocks, > >>>> >>>> which is a great strategy, sure, but stock prices will adjust > >>>> >>>> accordingly > >>>> >>>> anyway, so while they may be cheaper than usual, they won't > >>>> necessarily > >>>> >>>> be > >>>> >>>> mispriced, which is what I'm interested in. I can't always wait > >>>> >>>> for > >>>> >>>> some > >>>> >>>> kind of external economic movement to make money. > >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> As you've said, I don't want to match the market at all, else > >>>> >>>> I'd > >>>> >>>> go > >>>> >>>> passive. Stocks are priced at the value that the market values it > >>>> >>>> at > >>>> >>>> and > >>>> >>>> those are often subjective prices, more often than not.If I had a > >>>> basic > >>>> >>>> program to initiate buy/sell commands based on whether a stock > >>>> >>>> falls > >>>> >>>> below/above a certain price and expect it to earn money, I'd be a > >>>> >>>> billionaire by now. > >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Ilitirit Sama > >>>> >>>> <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>>> @GB > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> I did some reading up on using GA against the stock market. It > >>>> >>>>> seems > >>>> >>>>> some Hedge Funds use them already, but most of these funds are > >>>> already > >>>> >>>>> defunct (probably not because of the use of GAs though). Was > >>>> >>>>> that > >>>> >>>>> paper > >>>> >>>>> you mentioned by Peter Stone? It answers a lot of the questions > >>>> >>>>> I > >>>> had. > >>>> >>>>> It > >>>> >>>>> seems the evolution of the ANN happens way before the data is > run > >>>> >>>>> on > >>>> >>>>> live > >>>> >>>>> data. Stock Market GAs also tend to suffer from "over-fitting", > >>>> which > >>>> >>>>> is > >>>> >>>>> something I also mentioned. They try to adjust to past > >>>> >>>>> performance > >>>> in > >>>> >>>>> order to generate an expected result. However, most GAs don't > >>>> >>>>> take > >>>> >>>>> into > >>>> >>>>> account random fluctuations in the result, so they fail > miserably > >>>> when > >>>> >>>>> they > >>>> >>>>> try to derive patterns from the data. The best they can do is > to > >>>> >>>>> try > >>>> >>>>> to > >>>> >>>>> match the curve, which of course is very bad. > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Ilitirit Sama > >>>> >>>>> <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> >>>>>> He needs to confirm the subscription. The link should be at > the > >>>> >>>>>> bottom of any of the admins' messages. Give me his email > >>>> >>>>>> address. > >>>> >>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:03 PM, lindsey kiviets > >>>> >>>>>> <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx > >>>> >>>>>> > wrote: > >>>> >>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>> lol, > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>> @ilitrit , gimme th fgc link again please.i added Hilton > myself > >>>> >>>>>>> , > >>>> >>>>>>> and > >>>> >>>>>>> it seems he is not added to the mails. > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------ > >>>> >>>>>>> Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 13:59:14 +0200 > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > >>>> >>>>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx > >>>> >>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>> *lol* Guys will just have to put their cellphones where I can > >>>> >>>>>>> see > >>>> >>>>>>> em, > >>>> >>>>>>> or else :P Scumbaggery at it's finest :P > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>> I'm busy editing the vids. Will start uploading soon :) > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Ashraf Barendse < > >>>> >>>>>>> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>> The first rule of Random FG club is... > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>> Gohan is a charge character. I know this because LB knows > this. > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>> > ========================================================================= > >>>> >>>>>>> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community > >>>> >>>>>>> mailing > >>>> >>>>>>> list. > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>> > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> > > >>>> > ========================================================================= > >>>> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing > >>>> list. > >>>> > >>>> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc > >>>> > >>> > >> > > > ========================================================================= > You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list. > > //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > -- Ebrahiem Carr 079 499 4610