Link -_- On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Did anyone watch Infiltration vs Tokido? Highest level of Akuma play I've > seen. SFIV is relatively slow but it's so demanding on fast reactions and > situational awareness. In one situation Tokido did a combo into reset and > which he knew would trade if Infiltration did a DP. He did this because he > was calculating the stun values in his head. Infiltration went for the DP, > it traded and Tokido got the dizzy. So pro. > > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Sounds like he was having a pretty horrible nightmare. >> >> >> >> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> *On Behalf Of *Ilitirit Sama >> *Sent:* 05 February 2014 1:11 PM >> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> *Subject:* Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >> >> >> >> Go back to sleep. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Sean Carrington < >> theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Did someone say SFxT ? >> >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:04 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Gamernet House, 45 Salisbury Road, Cape Town, ZA >> >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Jack Steel <orichih@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Let me know were as it is my 1st time >> >> >> On 2/5/14, Jack Steel <orichih@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Reason y i have xbox and ps3 was 4 kof 13 but i did not get copy i had >> > sfxt found 1 sa player further no1.that's y i was gears of war player >> > now im stuck on ggpo 4 competition toying around. >> > >> > On 2/5/14, Jack Steel <orichih@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Im gonna start of slow c im new 2 group im sa and friendly .i had a >> >> copy of kof 12 but i need a copy of kof 13 i got xbox and ps3 and will >> >> soon upgrade graphic card 4 pc. To cover most platforms c what games r >> >> famous 2 play.train.and thn c it sound interesting.ill try 2 come 2 >> >> belville 2 get use 2 the flow. >> >> >> >> On 2/5/14, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> I remember playing you on GGPO. My user name is ilitirit but I don't >> >>> play >> >>> on there any more cos my GGPO doesn't work. We play on SupArc now. >> >>> It's >> >>> like GGPO but you can play against 3 people in a lobby if you want to. >> >>> >> >>> Are you going to come to the Saturday sessions in Bellville? >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Jack Steel <orichih@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> My ggpo user is goku1up- and finalfighter i smashed many ggpo kof >> 2002 >> >>>> players avk team sa and other locals they tried all cheats 2 no >> profit >> >>>> i hope to get smashed in kof13 and other platforms.smash or b >> >>>> smashed"d.^_^;) >> >>>> >> >>>> On 2/3/14, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>>> > I wonder if they would have done the same if it was me? >> >>>> > >> >>>> > Or would they be all like... call the hospital, this man is about >> to >> >>>> have a >> >>>> > heart-attack. >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Sean Carrington >> >>>> > <theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx >> >>>> >> wrote: >> >>>> > >> >>>> >> I think I'm troubled. >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> I might have cursed one too many times at the GM of Telkom >> >>>> >> Claremont. >> >>>> >> I was escorted out of the mall by security... *facepalm*. >> >>>> >> On 03 Feb 2014 4:02 PM, "G B" <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >>> "subjective prices" - I mean that they are priced subjectively... >> >>>> >>> See >> >>>> >>> DeBont and Thaler (1985)'s classic overreaction hypothesis, or >> >>>> >>> google >> >>>> >>> anything on herding, as a basic yet 'oh so' applicable example. >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 3:52 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>>> Never heard of Peter Stone. Can you send me the title of the >> >>>> >>>> article >> >>>> or >> >>>> >>>> the pdf? I'd love to read it. >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> The reason why its frequently mentioned/used within the Hedge >> Fund >> >>>> >>>> industry is due to how rapidly HFs change, as can be seen in the >> >>>> >>>> quant >> >>>> >>>> meltdown of 2007 (In three days, you could've made R1 turn into >> >>>> >>>> R500, >> >>>> >>>> if >> >>>> >>>> you were at the right place at the right time). Testing for >> >>>> >>>> adaption >> >>>> >>>> here >> >>>> >>>> is extremely interesting, and saves you years of work. HFs is >> also >> >>>> >>>> the >> >>>> >>>> canary in the coal mine in world of finance. >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> You are spot on with the over-fitting issue. :-) I corrected >> this >> >>>> >>>> when >> >>>> >>>> I >> >>>> >>>> implemented mine. When using fundamental analysis, they'd >> >>>> >>>> implement >> >>>> >>>> like, >> >>>> >>>> 15 different fundamental metrics, of which maybe 4 or 5 have any >> >>>> >>>> statical >> >>>> >>>> significance. In fact, certain researchers went to the extent of >> >>>> running >> >>>> >>>> a >> >>>> >>>> GA to select the variables for "best-fit" first... which is akin >> >>>> >>>> to >> >>>> >>>> data-mining in the sense that they are finding the best >> variables >> >>>> >>>> that >> >>>> >>>> fit >> >>>> >>>> with the given data BEFORE running the algorithm. >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> And yes, the evolutionary algorithm is trained using a data-base >> >>>> first, >> >>>> >>>> before it goes live. Typically, the GA selects the variables and >> >>>> >>>> the >> >>>> ANN >> >>>> >>>> is >> >>>> >>>> what does all the decision making. Having the computer decide >> what >> >>>> >>>> it >> >>>> >>>> should do for both is unwise, or at least, I think so. >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> Like I said, you put garbage in, you going to get garbage out, >> >>>> >>>> that >> >>>> >>>> is >> >>>> >>>> how it works with these black box machines, so yeah, people have >> >>>> >>>> used >> >>>> >>>> GA's >> >>>> >>>> before, but like we both mentioned, how you program it and I >> would >> >>>> >>>> is >> >>>> >>>> totally different, which means it would learn differently, just >> as >> >>>> >>>> we >> >>>> >>>> do. >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> You also mentioned "Buy-Low/Sell-High" when there are economic >> >>>> >>>> shocks, >> >>>> >>>> which is a great strategy, sure, but stock prices will adjust >> >>>> >>>> accordingly >> >>>> >>>> anyway, so while they may be cheaper than usual, they won't >> >>>> necessarily >> >>>> >>>> be >> >>>> >>>> mispriced, which is what I'm interested in. I can't always wait >> >>>> >>>> for >> >>>> >>>> some >> >>>> >>>> kind of external economic movement to make money. >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> As you've said, I don't want to match the market at all, else >> >>>> >>>> I'd >> >>>> >>>> go >> >>>> >>>> passive. Stocks are priced at the value that the market values >> it >> >>>> >>>> at >> >>>> >>>> and >> >>>> >>>> those are often subjective prices, more often than not.If I had >> a >> >>>> basic >> >>>> >>>> program to initiate buy/sell commands based on whether a stock >> >>>> >>>> falls >> >>>> >>>> below/above a certain price and expect it to earn money, I'd be >> a >> >>>> >>>> billionaire by now. >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Ilitirit Sama >> >>>> >>>> <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>>> @GB >> >>>> >>>>> >> >>>> >>>>> I did some reading up on using GA against the stock market. It >> >>>> >>>>> seems >> >>>> >>>>> some Hedge Funds use them already, but most of these funds are >> >>>> already >> >>>> >>>>> defunct (probably not because of the use of GAs though). Was >> >>>> >>>>> that >> >>>> >>>>> paper >> >>>> >>>>> you mentioned by Peter Stone? It answers a lot of the >> questions >> >>>> >>>>> I >> >>>> had. >> >>>> >>>>> It >> >>>> >>>>> seems the evolution of the ANN happens way before the data is >> run >> >>>> >>>>> on >> >>>> >>>>> live >> >>>> >>>>> data. Stock Market GAs also tend to suffer from >> "over-fitting", >> >>>> which >> >>>> >>>>> is >> >>>> >>>>> something I also mentioned. They try to adjust to past >> >>>> >>>>> performance >> >>>> in >> >>>> >>>>> order to generate an expected result. However, most GAs don't >> >>>> >>>>> take >> >>>> >>>>> into >> >>>> >>>>> account random fluctuations in the result, so they fail >> miserably >> >>>> when >> >>>> >>>>> they >> >>>> >>>>> try to derive patterns from the data. The best they can do is >> to >> >>>> >>>>> try >> >>>> >>>>> to >> >>>> >>>>> match the curve, which of course is very bad. >> >>>> >>>>> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >>>> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Ilitirit Sama >> >>>> >>>>> <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: >> >>>> >>>>> >> >>>> >>>>>> He needs to confirm the subscription. The link should be at >> the >> >>>> >>>>>> bottom of any of the admins' messages. Give me his email >> >>>> >>>>>> address. >> >>>> >>>>>> >> >>>> >>>>>> >> >>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:03 PM, lindsey kiviets >> >>>> >>>>>> <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx >> >>>> >>>>>> > wrote: >> >>>> >>>>>> >> >>>> >>>>>>> lol, >> >>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>>>>>> @ilitrit , gimme th fgc link again please.i added Hilton >> myself >> >>>> >>>>>>> , >> >>>> >>>>>>> and >> >>>> >>>>>>> it seems he is not added to the mails. >> >>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------ >> >>>> >>>>>>> Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 13:59:14 +0200 >> >>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >> >>>> >>>>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx >> >>>> >>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>>>>>> *lol* Guys will just have to put their cellphones where I can >> >>>> >>>>>>> see >> >>>> >>>>>>> em, >> >>>> >>>>>>> or else :P Scumbaggery at it's finest :P >> >>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>>>>>> I'm busy editing the vids. Will start uploading soon :) >> >>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Ashraf Barendse < >> >>>> >>>>>>> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>>>>>> The first rule of Random FG club is... >> >>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>>>>>> Gohan is a charge character. I know this because LB knows >> this. >> >>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> ========================================================================= >> >>>> >>>>>>> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community >> >>>> >>>>>>> mailing >> >>>> >>>>>>> list. >> >>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>>>>>> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc >> >>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >>>>>> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> > >> >>>> >> ========================================================================= >> >>>> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing >> >>>> list. >> >>>> >> >>>> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> ========================================================================= >> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list. >> >> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >> >> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >> >> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >> obtained from your KPMG representative. >> >> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >> AntiVirus software. >> > >