Hey people... Thanks for all the productive and fun comments... :) As i am leaving for 1 1/2 day now i wanted to try and get the most important rule put into cement if possible... The (un)voting @'s issue...: So here is a proposition, i like rip's idea of having a part of the clowns join the decision process so we can either make that crowd level dependant (above certain level means can vote) or we just put together a list of names like that by majority vote between us. Once that is done anyone who is on that list or any of us can at any moment propose for a vote to be help over an existing @ (cornercase if he is part of that list of leeter @'s... that'd be somewhat more complex... would prolly be only us voting then). This would be a vote by majority and we could do it such that any of us has veto right meaning we go by majority of votes between US and THEM (@'s in #cisco we chose worthy) but if any of US veto's then the thing crumbles... Similar approach for new @'s voting... Any thoughts, comments, pics, are welcome... :) Cheerz and see ya on friday... Pablo