[ciscomgr] Re: more salad tossing
- From: tlv <tlv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: ciscomgr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 06:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
k... that will prolly work... :)
Will give us some kind of a feeling of what the peasants are
thinking without having to bow....
Yeah so uhmm let's just start asking them for their email and add
them (making sure the list is closed of course...) one by one...
One thingie... if we were to ever hold a vote on whether or not to vote
OFF an existing @ then of course uhmm we will have a little dilemma i
think, can't really expect people to reply ALL and to voice their oppinion
when asked to vote one of "them" out or canya? :)
Maybe we should in general have them send their replies/votes to ciscomgr
instead of ciscoops@, that would alleviate the privacy problem, of course
that still will be weird if sending email to ciscoops@ asking to vote
about a person that's on ciscoops@ if you see what i mean... *shrug*
blabla
</brainfart>
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 WayzNMeanz@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> In a message dated Fri, 27 Sep 2002 4:34:08 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> tlv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> > Or we could just not let people know the details, have them vote and do
> > with it what we want lol.... tyranny disguised as democracy
> > or
> > something...
>
> the above is the way i would say to run it, let the people think they
> actually have a vote, but any of us could veto or overrride as long as the
> rest of US are not completely opposed to it,,,
>
> as for who is on this list, everyone in X id say
>
> l8r
>
> r|p
>
>
Other related posts:
