[bookport] Re: Opinion Needed
- From: Clarence Whaley <clarence@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 15:12:12 -0600
I too like the idea of keeping the clips.
At 02:08 PM 2/2/2005 -0700, you wrote:
>Hi Larry,
>
>The clips do seem to be more durable than springs. Since there are only two
>batteries to be inserted, trial and error installation is reasonably easy.
>Wonder if something could be done to the clips to differentiate them?
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "LARRY SKUTCHAN" <lskutchan@xxxxxxx>
>To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 2:06 PM
>Subject: [bookport] Opinion Needed
>
>
> > What do you all think of the merits of spring based battery connections vs
>=
> > the clip type connectors currently used on Book Port?
> >
> > One appealing thing about the springs, of course, is the fact that it is =
> > easier to identify the correct orientation of the battery, but what about
>=
> > the possibility of damage to springs? The clips don't seem nearly as easy
>=
> > to break.
> >
> >
> >
Clarence Whaley
Training Division Manager
GW Micro
E-Mail: Clarence@xxxxxxxxxxx
Direct Voice (615) 383-6248
or 866-699-8901
Direct Fax (260) 489-2608
GW Micro Voice Number 260-489-3671
http://www.gwmicro.com
or press enter below to read all about our training program
http://www.gwmicro.com/training
Other related posts:
