[aztec-users] Re: NURBS in Aztec?
- From: richard <rm.vaneijbergen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: aztec-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 17:16:46 +0200
..and that's another reason why I forgot about the idea of having a
NURBS implementation in Aztec (currently <--!).
Maybe in a few (many) years.....
'normal' splines would be a good addition though..
- Richard
On 2002.07.08 16:30 Alexander Enzmann wrote:
>
>
> > > - 3DM import (see www.opennurbs.com and www.rhino3d.com, it's
> an open
> > > file format).
> >
> > We don't handle nurbs geoetry at all. No reason why it cannot be
> implemented
> > however.
>
> Personally, I'm not convinced it's a good idea. Doing NURBS right is
> hard (particularly mating trim curves) - people would be better off
> using Rhino & exporting triangles as appropriate. Would NURBS really
> be
> in keeping with the intent of Aztec? Would effort be better spent in
> making modelling tools?
>
> Xander
>
>
>
Other related posts:
