[argyllcms] Re: colprof and proofing purposes
- From: Michael Schulz <ms.typografik@xxxxxx>
- To: <argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:02:41 +0200
Hello Nikolay,
another good advice - thank you. Now I have to find the time to do all
this...
Regards
Michael
Am 28.09.2009 15:37 Uhr schrieb "Nikolay Pokhilchenko" unter
<nikolay_po@xxxxxxx>:
> Hello, Michael!
>
> I'm preferring the -qh or even -qu profile quality for inkjet printers. But
> You should use a high number of different test patches for high precision
> mode. For example, I print about 2700-3600 patches for -qu. There may be a
> difference: the higher quality mode have more freedom to curve the channels,
> that's why there may be some strange effects. It may be noticeable when test
> patch quantity is insufficient for the device characterization at certain
> region.
Other related posts:
