Am Dienstag, 27. Juli 2010 schrieb Florian Höch: > > I had the same problem. Default fedora package failed on running > > dispwin -L. The one compiled from original Argyll source run > > without a problem. There seems to be a bug in the fedora > > package. > > If only it were a bug. It seems this was a deliberate change: > > //www.freelists.org/post/argyllcms/Centralize-the-definition-t > o-use-UCMM > > I really wonder why on earth they did this? I feel sorry for > Graeme. After all the libusb stuff I was really hoping distros > would give him a break... Whatever reason they have: It is not working as designed so it is a bug. What is worst at this point: I don't care what fedora is doing with argyll. If it don't work, I use the original source (what I do most of the time anyway). But how many people out there try to use the original source or binary package if something is not working? Martin